The complaint doesn't whisper it. It says it plainly.
Jimmy's Corner, the 55-year-old boxing bar on West 44th Street, is suing its landlord, the Durst Organization, one of the wealthiest real estate families in New York City history. The lawsuit alleges discrimination, fraud, and bad faith. Most of the coverage has focused on the lease dispute, the death clause, the demolition clause, the competing timelines. That's the part that fits neatly into a real estate story. But buried in the complaint, and confirmed by multiple sources who reviewed it, is an allegation that should make anyone who's spent time in this city go cold.
According to the lawsuit filed in New York State Supreme Court in December 2025 and amended in January 2026, Durst property manager Ben Mexhuani told Adam Glenn in late 2023 that tenants had complained about patrons congregating outside the bar. Adam pointed out that customers from other Durst-managed properties did the same thing. The response, per the complaint: the people from those businesses "don't look like Jimmy's Corner's customers."
The lawsuit states that bar management had been advised that some tenants complained specifically about "a significant number" of patrons who were Black men entering and exiting the building and congregating near the entrance to smoke.
It then states that patrons of all races exhibit the exact same behavior for which Black patrons were singled out. No complaints, the lawsuit says, were ever communicated to the bar about any other group.
The Durst Organization has not responded to that specific allegation. Not once. Multiple outlets have asked. The silence is its own statement.
To understand why this matters, you have to understand what Jimmy's Corner actually is. James Glenn opened the bar in 1971 at a time when nobody respectable wanted to be in Times Square. He was a Golden Gloves boxer turned trainer who worked with Floyd Patterson, Howard Davis Jr., and more. He ran the Times Square Boxing Club on West 42nd Street until 1993. He befriended Seymour Durst, patriarch of the real estate dynasty, after reportedly preventing Durst from being robbed in the neighborhood. They built a lease relationship on that trust. The bar stayed. Times Square got cleaned up, sanitized, corporatized, and monetized. Jimmy's Corner stayed anyway, selling $3 beers in a neighborhood where the average retail rent now runs roughly $2 million per year for 1,000 square feet, the size of the bar itself. Durst was charging $5,022.25 per month.
Then Glenn died in May 2020 from COVID-19, at 89 years old. His son Adam, Harvard Law graduate and former M&A attorney, took over. And according to the lawsuit, things started to shift. When the landlord first tried to terminate Jimmy's lease in late 2023, they backed down, but only after demanding that Adam hire security, install cameras, and ensure no incidents occurred anywhere near the building, whether or not customers were involved. No other tenants in the defendants' portfolio faced similar requirements, such as another Durst tenant. Adam complied. He installed cameras. The complaints stopped. The lawsuit alleges that is not a coincidence.
The discrimination allegations are grounded in New York State and City human rights laws. The suit seeks at least $1.5 million in damages and a declaration that the termination clause is void. According to the ACLU's Racial Justice Program attorney Alejandro Agustín Ortiz, cited in Inc. Magazine's coverage, civil rights claims like this typically turn on documented patterns, not isolated incidents. When the same lawful behavior gets documented and escalated for one group and ignored for another, that is the pattern lawyers look for. The lawsuit argues Jimmy's Corner has that pattern in writing.
At a recent court hearing, counsel for Jimmy's Corner argued that the landlord's invocation of the death clause was tied to racial animus, and that the bar's claims rest not on the 2010 insertion of the clause alone, but on a continuing pattern of discriminatory conduct that culminated in the 2025 termination notice. Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Nancy Bannon has reserved judgment. A prior order prohibiting eviction remains in effect while she considers the motion to dismiss.
The Durst Organization's public line has been consistent: they gave the bar a sweetheart deal for decades, they offered $250,000 to relocate, they were generous beyond what the lease required. Maybe all of that is true. It doesn't answer the question of why the property manager described the Black customers as a category distinct from other tenants' customers. It doesn't explain why the security and camera requirements were applied to Jimmy's Corner and not Osteria al Doge. It doesn't address what's in the complaint. And the Durst Organization, with all its lawyers and spokespeople, knows that.
Jimmy's Corner is still open. The $3 beers are still pouring. Adam Glenn has said publicly that whatever happens, the bar moves forward. But the real story here was never about a dive bar versus a real estate empire, as dramatic as that is. The real story is what gets documented and what gets ignored, and who decides which is which, in a building where one business has Black customers and the other has a name like Osteria al Doge. That's the story New York has been telling in ways both quiet and catastrophic for generations. This time, someone wrote it down in a court filing.
The Durst Organization should answer for it. They haven't. That tells you something too.
Like this? Explore more from:
