I've been watching the food tour industry move through New York for years. Not because it's the most important economic force in this city's food culture — it isn't. But because it's a reliable tell. The food tour market is a bet on which neighborhoods are worth commodifying, and who gets to profit when they are. Last week, that question got answered in a very specific way.
Secret Food Tours announced it had acquired Ultimate Food Tours in New York City. The trade press called it "rapid growth." The press release talked about "bringing together two leading culinary brands." What actually happened is more specific, and more important. A private equity-backed UK corporation, Essor Ltd., incorporated in England and Wales, just consolidated control over a meaningful share of New York City's curated food experience market. The tours still start in Chinatown. They still walk through the Lower East Side. The profits go to London.
I want to put that plainly, because the framing matters more than the headline.
Ultimate Food Tours wasn't built by a corporation. It was built by Scott Goodfriend, an independent operator who turned a personal obsession into a real business. He started with one Chinatown tour on Airbnb Experiences. He grew it to six NYC food tours and four cooking classes. He earned coverage from CNBC, Entrepreneur Magazine, and NBC News. Built stop by stop, by someone who actually lives in and loves this city.
Secret Food Tours is a different kind of company entirely. Essor Ltd. operates in 110 cities globally. Bangkok. Tokyo. Istanbul. Athens. Montreal. And yes, Chinatown. They have 500 plus guides on payroll and 400,000 customers a year. They're backed by Harwood Private Equity and Pembroke VCT. They're listed in the Deloitte UK Fast 50. They had a record month in New York in December, 1,518 guests in a single month. Their stated revenue target is $50 million by 2027 and their explicit growth strategy is acquisition. They bought Seattle Bites Food Tours in Seattle. They bought Little Havana Tours in Miami. Now they've bought Ultimate Food Tours in New York.
This is a tourism platform with an acquisition playbook.
And that playbook has real consequences for this city. Greenwich Village, Little Italy, Chinatown — these are not neighborhoods to Essor Ltd. They are product lines. The company trades on local authenticity as a feature while operating as a multinational tourism brand. What's actually hidden from view is who benefits.
The restaurants whose food anchors these tours — the Fujianese spot in Chinatown, the Jewish deli on the Lower East Side, the bakery that's been on the same block for two generations — didn't build their businesses to be stops on a corporate tour route. They built them to feed the people who live nearby. The tour company routes twenty tourists through them, calls it an authentic experience, prices the ticket accordingly, and keeps the margin. The restaurant absorbs a table of twelve showing up during the Saturday lunch rush for tasting portions.
That is not a revenue relationship. That is foot traffic dressed up as partnership.
Let me be fair about something. A genuinely good food tour can serve operators. A guide who knows the owners by name, who sends customers back on a Tuesday when traffic is thin, who tells the real story of how the food got here — that version works and I've seen it. But that version requires a guide who is embedded in the neighborhood, invested in the operators, and accountable to the community. Not to a KPI on a technology dashboard in London.
None of that survives acquisition by a global platform whose operating logic is: standardize the product, optimize the margin, scale the route.
When you optimize a food tour for margin across 110 cities, you remove unpredictability. You remove the 12-seat spot that can't handle disruption. You remove the operator whose kitchen doesn't have enough lead time for group visits. You keep the photogenic stops that can produce a consistent, high-volume product. The route gets cleaner. More repeatable. More TripAdvisor-friendly. And progressively less connected to the actual city underneath it.
Here's the broader context, because this doesn't exist in isolation.
NYC's independent food operators are already carrying serious structural pressure. Delivery platform commissions run 15 to 30 percent and the operators who depend on them most have the thinnest margins. Rents in the neighborhoods that food tours love to sell, Chinatown, the Lower East Side, the Village — have not come down. The pipeline of immigrant operators who built the city's food identity is thinning as federal border policy makes it harder for the people who actually cook this city's food to get here and stay here.
In that environment, the food tour market just got more consolidated, not less. The consolidation happened in favor of a company that is accountable to private equity in London, not to the neighborhoods in New York.
That doesn't have to be a permanent condition.
Operator-owned food tours are not complicated to run. A collective of eight to twelve operators in a neighborhood, Chinatown, Jackson Heights, East Harlem, Flatbush, can agree on a route, hire a guide who works for them rather than for a global corporation, set a per-head price, and split the revenue directly. No Essor Ltd. in the middle. No PE fund taking a cut. The guide is accountable to the operators. The operators share the upside. The story stays in the neighborhood. Anyone who has run a market, a pop-up series, or a food festival knows how to structure this. It is the same mechanics.
The second move is negotiating from position instead of treating inclusion as a privilege. If a tour company routes guests through your restaurant twice a week, that is a distribution arrangement, not a compliment. It should be paid like one. Per-head participation fees, revenue sharing agreements, guaranteed monthly minimums — these are all negotiable. Most operators have never tried because the industry has trained them to believe that being on the route is the prize. You have the product. Stop giving it away for the exposure.
The third move is the long game and it's the most important one. The reason Chinatown can be packaged and sold as an "authentic NYC food experience" by a company registered in England and Wales is that the story of who built it — which families, which provinces, which recipes, which sacrifices — lives mostly in the neighborhood itself and not in the public record. Culture that is documented is harder to commodify because it has named owners. Named stories don't belong to whoever holds the TripAdvisor ranking or controls the booking platform.
That is the work New York Eats Here exists to do. Every operator we document, every block we cover, every dish we trace to its origin is a counter-claim. It says this food culture was made by specific people with specific names. Not by a press release. Not by a corporation operating in 110 cities. Not by a PE-backed platform that decided NYC was the next stop on its acquisition map.
Secret Food Tours buying Ultimate Food Tours is not the end of anything. But it is a clear signal. NYC's food neighborhoods are worth acquiring. They're worth building global products around. They're worth scaling across a private equity growth roadmap all the way to $50 million in revenue.
The people who built those neighborhoods — the operators, the cooks, the families — are still the last ones to get paid in that transaction.
That doesn't have to be the ending.
Like this? Explore more from:
