By Marco Shalma

There are arguments that deserve nuance, and then there are arguments that shouldn’t exist in the first place. This is one of those. New York City should ban charging for water in clubs and nightlife venues. Not bottled water. Not premium anything. Basic water. Tap water. Hydration. The thing human bodies need more of when alcohol, heat, crowd density, and music all collide at once. It’s common sense.

Nightlife is not a neutral environment. Clubs control the temperature, the lighting, the exits, the pacing, the alcohol flow, and the density of bodies in a room. They sell drinks that actively dehydrate you. They encourage movement. They encourage staying longer. They discourage leaving and coming back. That’s the product. That’s the experience. And in that environment, treating water like a luxury upsell is backwards.

Anyone who has worked a door, a bar, a DJ booth, or a production shift knows this. At peak hours, rooms run hot. Lines get long. Bathrooms get crowded. People sweat. People dance. People drink. And when someone realizes they need water, the options are often limited on purpose. The tap is hidden behind the bar. The request gets ignored. The alternative is an eight to twelve dollar bottle that suddenly feels less like a beverage and more like a toll.

Alcohol is a diuretic. That’s not opinion. Dehydration increases the likelihood of dizziness, fainting, overheating, and medical emergencies. Add packed dance floors, limited airflow, stimulants that are present whether venues acknowledge them or not, and increasingly extreme heat, and the equation becomes obvious. Hydration is harm reduction. Full stop.

This is why festivals figured this out years ago. Major music festivals mandate free water refill stations. Not because they’re altruistic, but because dehydration incidents overwhelm medical teams, create liability, and destroy the experience. It’s cheaper, safer, and smarter to give people water than to deal with ambulances, lawsuits, or tragedies. Many venues outside the U.S. are required by law to provide free tap water wherever alcohol is sold. This is not radical policy. It’s industry standard elsewhere.

New York, somehow, still treats this like a debate.

The usual counterargument is business. Water costs money. Staff time. Cups. Infrastructure. But that argument collapses the moment you look at the actual economics. Water is not a meaningful revenue stream for nightlife venues. Alcohol is. Entry fees are. Tables are. Brand deals are. Water is a rounding error compared to the cost of a single medical incident, a bad headline, or a reputation hit that follows a venue for years.

Good operators already know this. Some quietly provide water without advertising it. Some install refill stations. Some train staff to give water when asked. They do it because it keeps people safe, keeps them in the venue longer, and keeps the night from going sideways. A ban doesn’t punish good venues. It protects them from competing with bad ones cutting corners.

This is where conscious capitalism comes in. Real capitalism isn’t squeezing every possible dollar out of every possible moment. It’s building systems that last. It’s aligning profit with sustainability. It’s understanding that short-term extraction creates long-term damage. Nightlife thrives when people feel safe, respected, and taken care of. Water is part of that infrastructure, not a giveaway.

There’s also a cultural layer New York needs to confront. This city loves to talk about nightlife as identity. We export club culture, music culture, dance culture, and fashion to the rest of the world. We pride ourselves on endurance. On being able to go all night. On earning the morning. But then we punish basic self-care inside the very spaces we celebrate. That contradiction is embarrassing.

Selling water in clubs is a relic of an older mentality. One where discomfort was part of the flex. One where survival was proof of belonging. That mentality doesn’t make nights better. It just makes them riskier. And risk is not edge. It’s negligence.

A ban doesn’t have to be complicated. Require free access to tap water wherever alcohol is served. Clear signage. Cups available. Refill stations where possible. No requirement to give bottled water away. Enforcement through existing licensing and inspection frameworks. This isn’t a new bureaucracy. It’s a line item in the rules that already exist.

The city already regulates capacity, noise, exits, alcohol service, security, and hours. It already intervenes in nightlife constantly. Pretending water is where regulation suddenly becomes overreach is dishonest. If anything, this is one of the least invasive, most effective interventions available.

And let’s be clear. This isn’t anti-club. It’s pro-nightlife. Medical emergencies kill vibes. Overheated rooms end parties early. Ambulances outside venues don’t make anyone look cool. Safer rooms last longer, feel better, and build real loyalty. DJs play better when the crowd feels good. Bartenders deal with fewer problems. Security intervenes less. Everyone wins.

The street already understands this. Ask dancers. Ask promoters. Ask medics. Ask harm-reduction teams. Ask anyone who has worked past midnight in this city. The consensus is there. What’s missing is the will to formalize it.

New York likes to think of itself as tough, but toughness isn’t ignoring obvious problems. Toughness is fixing them without losing the soul of the city. This is an easy win. Cheap. Effective. Humane. A policy that says, “We want you here. We want you dancing. We want you safe.”

A city that can regulate alcohol down to the ounce can figure out how to stop selling thirst. State of the Street means paying attention to what actually happens when the music gets loud. Right now, what’s happening is unnecessary risk dressed up as tradition. New York can do better. And if it wants to keep calling itself the capital of nightlife culture, it should start by making sure people can drink water without pulling out a credit card.

This shouldn’t even be controversial.

Like this? Explore more from: